“How Western Films Evolved: From White Hats to Revisionist Antiheroes” By Chris Conidis —
- chrisconidis5
- Apr 3
- 4 min read
There was a time, back in the dusty reels of early American film, when a certain figure kept showing up. He wore a wide-brimmed hat, carried a gun at his side, and somehow carried the weight of a whole nation’s identity along with it.He was the cowboy — sometimes a soldier, sometimes a settler, a vigilante, or just a drifter passing through.
He was the “American,” a manufactured icon who would dominate the cinematic frontier for decades. But behind the squinting gaze and horseback silhouette stood something else entirely: a cultural mythology stitched together by the biases and fantasies of a white male Hollywood, writing its own origin story at the expense of others. As a filmmaker and storyteller, I’ve always been fascinated by what film says about who we are — or who we think we are. The Western genre, more than any other, has served as a mirror, a myth-machine, and sometimes… a mask.
The Myth-Making MachineIn the early Westerns, patriotism rode tall in the saddle. The cowboy symbolized rugged self-reliance, American destiny, and moral clarity. But as many of scholars have noted, the Western wasn’t just telling stories — it was writing history from a white, settler-colonial perspective.Native Americans were cast as savage “injuns,” Mexicans as bandits or caricatures, and foreigners as disposable. In these films, the “white hat” always belonged to the American settler. The West was shown not as a land to share or understand — but a prize to be conquered and civilized. The film industry wasn’t just shaping fiction — it was shaping identity.
The Cracks in the MonumentBut myths can only hold for so long. By the 1950s, Westerns like John Ford’s The Searchers began to fracture the genre from within. Ford, who helped build the Western’s iconography, also helped challenge it. In The Searchers, John Wayne’s character Ethan Edwards is not a noble hero, but a racist, obsessive figure — a man hell-bent on vengeance even if it means killing his own niece, now adopted into Comanche life It’s one of the earliest signs of what would become the revisionist Western — films that deconstructed the genre’s glossy patriotism and began to address the racism, violence, and hypocrisy buried beneath.
The Revisionist ReckoningAs the country moved through turbulent decades — civil rights marches, the trauma of Vietnam, and the long shadow of the Cold War — Western films didn’t stay the same. The genre began to shift. Directors like Sam Peckinpah (The Wild Bunch), Sergio Leone (Once Upon a Time in the West), and Delmer Daves (Broken Arrow) stepped in, pulling apart the old myths and rewriting the rules of the cowboy code.Their films featured morally gray characters, systemic violence, and dying legends who could no longer outrun time.These weren’t just Westerns. They were autopsies of a genre.“The most overtly ideological of revisionist Westerns concerned the Indian wars,” wrote Richard Slotkin. “The revelation of the American atrocities in Vietnam only reinforced the argument that the slaughter of Native Americans was less the distortion than the essence of the white man’s wars.”The cowboy was no longer a savior. He was a relic. And the West? It was a graveyard of outdated myths.
A Genre Reborn — Among the StarsBut genres, like old outlaws, rarely die — they reinvent.I n the late 20th century, the Western was reborn in disguise. It traded in its horses for spaceships. Its frontier for galaxies. Star Wars and Star Trek weren’t just sci-fi — they were Westerns in space.Gene Roddenberry called Star Trek the “Wagon Train to the Stars.” George Lucas lifted entire tropes from the Western: barroom brawls, desert landscapes, the lone gunslinger wandering into town. The themes of rugged individualism, frontier justice, and moral conflict carried forward — just in new costumes.The Space Western became the next chapter in America’s myth-making saga.
Where the Western Stands TodaySo, is the Western dead?Not at all. It’s older. Wiser. And still evolving.Films from the 90’s on like Dances with Wolves, Silverado, and Hostiles have continued the revisionist trend — blending sweeping landscapes with more honest examinations of race, power, and history. Meanwhile, new filmmakers are asking different questions: What does the Western look like through Indigenous eyes? Through feminist lenses? Through multicultural casts?As an amatuer filmmaker myself, I see the Western not as a relic, but a canvas. A genre that invites reinterpretation. A sandbox where storytelling, identity, and history collide. It still holds potential — not in its old armor, but in the hands of those willing to rebuild it with care, honesty, and imagination.
Why This Matters to Me as an amateur FilmmakerWe’re living in an era where genres collide and shift — where familiar myths get pulled apart, and new voices are finally stepping forward to shape the stories we see on screen. The Western, for all its flaws and contradictions, hasn’t disappeared. It still holds a strange, enduring power — a genre full of ghosts, grit, and meaning waiting to be reimagined.For me, it’s more than dust, hats, and horses. I’m drawn to the Western because of what it reveals: the way a country struggles to define itself through conflict, legend, and cinema. As I continue crafting stories of my own, I find the West always riding alongside — its rawness, its regrets, and its reminders of what stories can really say about who we are.Because in the end, every story has its frontier. And every storyteller has their journey into the myth.
Interested in filmmaking, myth, and genre? Follow me for more reflections on cinema, storytelling, and the future of narrative art.
You can also find other essays and satire on / Medium
